If Taylor Swift thought she was helping Kamala with her endorsement, she just got some bad news! We are seeing hilarious backlash that this ultra-leftist pop star is getting for her pathetic endorsement. Also, there is now officially a smoking gun surrounding the ABC News debate. A new affidavit has just surfaced claiming the debate was fixed for Kamala Harris, and it looks like Congress is about to get involved.
Taylor Swifts endorsement turned more people away from Kamala Harris!!! Swifties it’s ok to be conservative and vote for Trump!!
This is your sign celeb endorsements are out common sense is in!! pic.twitter.com/I1MEfjFvWA
— MORGONN (@morgonnm) September 14, 2024
– Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris and Tim Walz was meant to boost enthusiasm.
– A YouGov poll showed it turned off more voters than it attracted, with 20% saying they were less likely to support Kamala due to the endorsement.
– Only 8% of voters felt more likely to support Kamala, while the majority (66%) said it had no effect on their choice.
One of the telltale signs that things didn’t go so well for Kamala in the debate last week was that minutes after it ended, pop star Taylor Swift came out and gave her public endorsement of Kamala Harris and Minnesota governor Tim Walz. The media loved how Kamala performed at the debate and they were ecstatic over this endorsement, claiming that this was a major game changer for the election.
A new poll just came out showing that Taylor Swift’s endorsement turns more voters away than it attracts. A study from YouGov found that just 8% of voters said that Taylor Swift’s endorsement is either somewhat or much more likely to convince them to vote for Kamala, but a whopping 20% said that they are somewhat or much less likely to vote for Kamala as a result of this endorsement! Not surprisingly, 66%, the vast majority, could care less and said the endorsement made absolutely no difference whatsoever on their choice.
The legacy media is demonstrating to all just how out of touch they are with mainstream opinion. But the legacy media cares very little about news, instead they only care about narrative, and the Taylor Swift endorsement pushed the narrative that Kamala was the second coming of Obama. Voting has already begun in parts of the country. The inconvenient truth is that there is simply no Democrat enthusiasm for Kamala. It doesn’t exist anywhere near the way it existed back in 2008.
In the early voting in both North Carolina and Florida, the republican enthusiasm is through the roof. Republicans have posted significant gains in vote by mail requests since 2020, while Democrat requests are down across the board.
An affidavit was set to be dropped from an ABC News whistleblower claiming he has evidence that the Kamala Harris campaign received questions ahead of time and that the debate was deliberately directed by the campaign itself! That affidavit has dropped and a whistleblower from ABC News has sworn under penalty of perjury that the Kamala Harris campaign received questions ahead of time and directed the debate. It’s been redacted, so we don’t know who, but it is from someone who claims to have worked at ABC News for the last 10 years.
This person confirmed that the Harris campaign was provided with sample questions that, while not the exact questions, covered similar topics that would appear during the debate. They said that it was planned for president Trump to be Fact Checked while Kamala would not be. There were also allegedly unethical discussions with the Harris campaign on how the debate would be conducted in such a way that benefits them.
If this turns out to be true, this would not be the first time this has happened. In 2016, the former democrat operative turned CNN commentator Donna Brazil leaked debate questions to the Clinton campaign prior to one of her debates with Trump. A number of very prominent people such as Elon Musk and billionaire Bill Ackman, a former democrat who is now renouncing the Democrat party, are calling on ABC and Disney executives to come clean with what they know based on these allegations.
The allegations substantively match what took place during the debate. The moderators were obviously biased towards Kamala and biased against Trump. He was obviously treated with a skeptical scrutiny that was waived for Kamala, and they need to come clean and explain themselves. At the same time, Kansas senator Roger Marshall has announced a congressional inquiry into the debate.
A formal letter has been sent to both ABC and the Harris campaign demanding all correspondence, records, and political coordination between the two parties ahead of Tuesday’s debate. This followed calls even from the former Clinton adviser Mark Penn for an investigation into the way in which ABC and the Harris campaign appeared to collude together to rig the debate in Harris’ favor.
ABC News basically destroyed whatever credibility the legacy media had prior to that debate. Every study over the last 20 years has shown that trust and confidence in the legacy media has eroded over the course of those two decades, and that debate only further corroborated that diminishing trust. Given that the business model for the legacy media is grounded in trust and confidence, we can expect to see the audience for the legacy media continue to shrink comparably.
The media cannot present itself as a reliable mediator of information that reliability has been so irrevocably soiled as it was in that debate! This affidavit and congressional investigation will be interesting, but in many ways, the legacy media has already sealed their own fate! The days of the legacy media have indeed come to an end.
Copyright, 2024. TurleyTalks.com
Our brand new Turley Talks app is our very own platform that can never, ever be canceled! This app is our way to declare our independence from all woke platforms that hate conservatives and have tried to cancel and demonetize Dr. Steve. You can download it completely free today by going to fight.turleytalks.com!
