The recent oral arguments regarding Tennessee's law banning medical gender transitions for minors have illuminated a significant turning point in the ongoing cultural battle against wokeness. With the Supreme Court poised to uphold this ban, the left's last-ditch efforts appear to be crumbling, marking what could be a pivotal moment in the decline of the woke ideology.
- The Supreme Court is expected to support the ban on medical transitions for minors, revealing the inadequacy of leftist arguments.
- A stark contrast is observed between how conservative and liberal justices acknowledge research, with the latter dismissing any evidence that contradicts the gender-affirming narrative.
- The political unviability of wokeness is reinforced by polling data indicating a substantial division within the left, while the right remains united against such issues.
During the hearings, conservative justices expressed skepticism towards the left's claims, yet the liberal contingent, particularly Justice Ketanji Brown, pushed the bounds of logic, hinting at a fervent ideological commitment. Perhaps the most astonishing moment came from Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who equated the risks of puberty blockers to those posed by taking an aspirin. This comparison was met with incredulity from legal scholars and the public alike, including Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, who highlighted the profound differences in risk profiles between over-the-counter pain relief and irreversible medical procedures for minors.
Turley noted that while conservative justices considered various studies, the left dismissed any data that contradicted their pro-trans standpoint. This one-sided approach is reminiscent of the treatment received by dissenting voices during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly regarding the Great Barrington Declaration, which promoted a more measured approach to pandemic response. Internal communications revealed efforts by Dr. Anthony Fauci and others to quash alternative viewpoints, raising questions about intellectual transparency and the integrity of public discourse.
Justice Sam Alito aptly criticized this evidential double standard, remarking on the fanaticism underlying these dismissals. The contrast between public opinion and the advocacy of the left is stark; polling from Rasmussen reveals that only 20 percent of Democrats support surgical transitions for minors, illustrating a profound disconnect with the party's leadership. This division on woke issues not only signifies diminishing support but also suggests that wokeness is becoming increasingly untenable in political discourse.
This sentiment is echoed across various sectors, as organizations like the LPGA and international swimming federations begin implementing bans on biological males in women’s sports. Such decisions signal a shift toward a more traditional understanding of gender and provide further evidence that the tide is turning against woke policies. Even the University of Michigan has reportedly discontinued its Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion initiatives, reflecting a broader cultural pivot.
In summary, the cumulative effects of these judicial and societal shifts indicate that wokeness is reaching its terminus. Its champions, now scattered and resorting to absurd rationalizations, face an uphill battle against a unifying opposition. As this ideology falters, the prevailing sense in the air suggests that its absence will not evoke nostalgia among the broader populace, heralding what may be the dawn of a new age of conservatism.
Copyright, 2024. TurleyTalks.com
Our brand new Turley Talks app is our very own platform that can never, ever be canceled! This app is our way to declare our independence from all woke platforms that hate conservatives and have tried to cancel and demonetize Dr. Steve. You can download it completely free today by going to fight.turleytalks.com!