America’s Wake-Up Call: Rejecting Liberal Illiteracy

In the aftermath of yesterday’s electoral results, the political landscape has been shaken, leaving many to question the competence of the Liberal Media and their so-called experts. The prediction of a Kamala Harris victory has proven to be a colossal miscall, leaving pundits like Bill Maher scrambling for answers. The political illiteracy exhibited by the leftist media corps has highlighted the dysfunction within this establishment. Doctor Steve Turley delves into the fallout, providing insights and dissecting the absurdity of these predictions while calling attention to a critical movement for change.

– The predictions surrounding Kamala Harris’s potential victory have been widely exposed as misguided and flawed.

– The incompetence of various media forecasters and pundits has led to widespread calls for a political overhaul.

– The rise of the “brokenists” suggests a growing disillusionment with traditional political structures, favoring radical change.

Newsweek’s bold prediction of a Kamala Harris victory was hilariously flawed. The list of forecasters, including the notorious Nate Silver and the insufferable predictions from the misinformed staff at 538, raised eyebrows across the board. The Economist’s pro-Harris stance further tarnishes any claims to objective forecasting. Endorsements masquerading as predictive models reveal the rottenness pervading the political class today.

Democrat strategist James Carville contributed his share of ludicrous reasoning in predicting Harris’s victory, details of which were promptly undermined by reputable outlets such as the New York Post. The absurdity reached new heights when Michael Moore made his predictions, showcasing the vacuity of left-wing political assessments. Even the so-called Nostradamus of election predictions, Allan Lichtman, displayed how subjective and influenced by personal bias forecasts have become.

Speaking of predictions, the Primary Model, developed by Professor Helmut Norpoth, famously heralded Donald Trump’s victory in 2016 by using primary performances as indicators for general election outcomes. However, in what can only be considered a slap in the face to logic, Norpoth bestowed a 75 percent chance of victory upon Kamala Harris—who, let’s remember, didn’t compete in a single primary. Such actions question whether those providing these assessments are oblivious to their incompetence or are simply toeing the party line.

This commentary underscores a much larger problem: our political institutions are characterized by dysfunction and stagnation. As journalist Alana Newhouse pointed out, our society has descended into a state of brokenism—chronicled by natural disasters to public health crises—revealing the severe decay within our governmental institutions. These entities—legacy media, academia, and federal bureaucracies—are hopelessly mired in incompetence.

The dichotomy that emerges is stark: those who believe the current regime cannot be repaired—the brokenists—versus those who hold onto the illusion of integrity within these institutions—the status quoists. The growing sentiment among citizens reveals a new coalition of brokenists fed up with incompetence, pushing for a radical overhaul.

As demonstrated through recent electoral outcomes, the time of Trump and the ultra-maga movement has come. Now stands the opportunity to rise and facilitate substantial changes needed to mend a fractured political landscape, ensuring future generations are not left with the remnants of this establishment’s failures. The call for transformation rings loud, and it’s time to embrace it.

Copyright, 2024. TurleyTalks.com

Our brand new Turley Talks app is our very own platform that can never, ever be canceled! This app is our way to declare our independence from all woke platforms that hate conservatives and have tried to cancel and demonetize Dr. Steve. You can download it completely free today by going to fight.turleytalks.com! 

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR